Illinois State Trapshooters Association

 Feedback

 

ATA Delegate Reports Board Meetings Clubs Directors Feedback
Hall of Fame Other Links ISTA State Teams Shoot Dates Notables
ADVERTISERS State Shoots Event Winners Advertising Opportunities ATA Grand Relocation Home
This form allows you, a current ISTA member, to let the Board of Directors know your opinion. If the opinion you express benefits ISTA members, we will publish it on this page. Published comments appear after the Feedback Form.
 

Feedback Form

Last Name*
  

First Name*

ISTA #*

e-mail*
 

Ok to publish my comments

Publish my comments without my name or ISTA #

Publish my comments with my name

*required

 

Comments
 

Published Comments

State Team Requirements

3/10/02

An ISTA Member asks the following question:

"1) Can you put a detailed explanation of the state team requirements in regards to shooting the zone shoots? 2) Many of us have heard you don't have to shoot your own zone this year and can still be eligible for the state team. 3) Is it true that by not shooting your own zone you'll only lose your eligibility for the zone team contest held during the state shoot?"

Answers:

1) To be considered for the State Team, shooters must meet the minimum target requirement during the 2002 shooting year:

Minimum Target Requirements:

Category Singles Handicap Doubles
Men 2,500 2,000 1,500
Women, Vets, Sr. Vets 1,500 1,500 1,000
Jr 800 800 600
Sub-Jr 500 500 400

 

They must shoot the State Shoot's All Around Targets as well as any Illinois Zones Shoot All Around Targets.

2) Yes

3) Yes

comment 1 of 2

Compliments about 2002 State Shoot Program

5/02/2002

From: Mr. Dan Field

"If there was a award for state programs, this years program would win hands down, the directors & those responsible for putting this years program did a excellent job. The program is out early to the membership, contains additional shooter history, vendor advertising has increased, all details for this years shoot are explained thoroughly. This years state shoot may be the largest ever.

comment 2 of 2

 

top